Legal Opinion
State v. Dudley
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 24, 1969No. 9190PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTRoop, J.
Thomas Dudley, Jr., was indicted and tried for assault with intent to kill one Roger Brocken ridge on or about September 17, 1967. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and a judgment was entered accordingly from which this appeal is taken.
Section 2901.24, Revised Code, defines the offense, as follows:
“No person shall assault another with intent to kill • • • 99
While the section does not contain words suggesting specific intent as an element of the crime, Ohio courts have held that a showing of malice is necessary for conviction under the statute.
Roger Breckenridge was a night watchman at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. MarandaOhio Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. NicelyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Raphello Harris, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- State v. ZarinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Stephen M. Epperly v. E.L. Booker, Warden Attorney General of the Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.