Legal Opinion
Commonwealth ex. rel. Page Milling Co. v. Shenandoah River Light & Power Corp.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 18, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
The jurisdictional question raised in this case has been well argued and a number of questions closely re*52lated to each other have been discussed. We do not think it necessary to follow these elaborate arguments in detail, because, in our view, this question is no longer debatable in this State.
The question is raised by The Page Milling Company, Incorporated (hereinafter called the milling company), which denies the jurisdiction of the State Corporation Commission (hereinafter called the Commission), to regulate the rates to be charged the milling company by the power company, upon the ground…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. TranbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Po River Water & Sewer Co. v. Indian Acres Club of Thornburg, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- City of New Haven v. New Haven Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- State v. Andy ScurlockWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Appalachian Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.