Legal Opinion

Amelco Electric v. City of Thousand Oaks

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2002No. S091069Published

1Opinion of the Court

115 Cal.Rptr.2d 900 (2002)

27 Cal.4th 228

38 P.3d 1120

AMELCO ELECTRIC, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, Defendant and Appellant.

No. S091069.

Supreme Court of California.

February 4, 2002.

Rehearing Denied March 13, 2002.

Mark G. Sellers, City Attorney; Negele & Associates, James R. Negele, Los Angeles; Lascher & Lascher and Wendy C. Lascher, Ventura, for Defendant and Appellant.

Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian, Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Nowland C. Hong, Michael M. Mullins and Michael S. Simon, Los Angeles, for the League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae, on…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API