Pugh v. Hermitage Loan Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart
This is a controversy between a “small loan company,” qualified and operating under Code, sections 6721-6743, and its borrower. At the suit of the latter, the chancellor decreed the cancellation of his obligation to the company, upon the chancellor’s finding, supported by stipulations of fact, that the sums paid by the borrower were sufficient to satisfy all legally enforceable claims of the lender.
On March 16, 1927, Pugh borrowed $300' from the loan company. There followed a series of eight similar transactions, the last being on April 15, 1933. On or before the maturity of each loan, a new…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Koen v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Personal Finance Co. v. HammackTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cumberland Capital Corp. v. PattyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs v. SolomonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- In Re BoganDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1968
- Smetal Corporation v. Family Loan Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Cumberland Capital Corp. v. PattyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.