Legal Opinion

Starkey Laboratories, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 29, 2001No. SLIP OP. 01-80; Court 93-07-00426Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WATSON, Senior Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff moves pursuant to CIT Rule 60(b)(6), or alternatively, CIT Rule 60(b)(1), 1 to vacate the judgment of dis missal in this action on May 10, 1995 for lack of prosecution entered by the clerk of the court pursuant to CIT Rule 83(c) 2 and to reinstate this case to the Reserve Calendar of the court for six months. Defendant opposes plaintiffs motion.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND 3

There is no dispute concerning the facts relevant to the current matter before the court.

This tariff classification action was initiated by the filing of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Marquip, Inc. v. Fosber America, Inc. And Fosber Spa, and United Container MacHinery Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API