Starkey Laboratories, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WATSON, Senior Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff moves pursuant to CIT Rule 60(b)(6), or alternatively, CIT Rule 60(b)(1), 1 to vacate the judgment of dis missal in this action on May 10, 1995 for lack of prosecution entered by the clerk of the court pursuant to CIT Rule 83(c) 2 and to reinstate this case to the Reserve Calendar of the court for six months. Defendant opposes plaintiffs motion.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND 3
There is no dispute concerning the facts relevant to the current matter before the court.
This tariff classification action was initiated by the filing of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Marquip, Inc. v. Fosber America, Inc. And Fosber Spa, and United Container MacHinery Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.