Legal Opinion
Acorn Realty, L. L. C. v. Torres
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided October 22, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*671OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Final judgment entered December 13, 1995 affirmed, with $25 costs.
On a nonjury trial, the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless the court’s conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence (Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 NY2d 490, 495). Applying that standard of review here, we find no cause to disturb the trial court’s determination that the tenant permitted a nuisance on the premises in failing to take any meaningful steps to curtail the recurrent and well-documented antisocial behavior of her…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Noce v. KaufmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Frank v. Park Summit Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Frank v. Park Summit Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
4Cited by3 opinions
- CHI-AM Realty, Inc. v. GuddahlAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
- Domen Holding Co. v. AranovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- 289 & 305 Assoc. v. MohanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016