Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Swift & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1936No. 24889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The note sued on in this case was an ordinary promissory note with the exception that it contained the following sentence: “This agent’s guaranty note given in conformity with requirements 'of consignment contract governing sale of fertilizer by undersigned as agent for Swift and Company.” To the suit on *794this note the defendant’s plea in part set up: “That a short time before the note sued on was executed, defendant entered into an oral agreement with the plaintiff by the terms of which, among other things, it was agreed that defendant would act as plaintiff’s agent for the sale of fertilizer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eighmie v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Johnson v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. McCoy v. Georgia Baptist HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Long v. CashCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. McCoy v. Georgia Baptist HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API