Legal Opinion
In re Route 103 Quarry
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 17, 2007No. 06-546PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Neighbors are appealing the Environmental Court’s decision granting an amended Act 250 permit that allows appellee J.R Carrara & Sons, Inc. to dig deeper into its quarry to extract stone. They seek to enforce what they claim is an automatic stay under V.R.CR. 62(a), which would preclude the quarry from operating under the amended permit during the pendency of their appeal. Based on our conclusion that the Legislature has established discretionary stays with respect to Environmental Court appeals, including appeals to this Court, we remand the matter for the Environmental Court to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gilbert v. GilbertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Town of Brattleboro v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Hartford Board of Library Trustees v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. Parkway CleanersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- First Quality Carpets, Inc. v. KirschbaumSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- McGoff v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- State v. Timothy P. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- Katzenbach Act 250 Permit - Decision on MeritsVermont Superior Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.