Legal Opinion

Mendez v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1988No. Docket Nos. F009987, F010027PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARDAIZ, J.

In this case involving sexual assault and battery, we are called upon to review the trial court’s denial of defendants’ motions under Code of Civil Procedure section 2017, subdivision (d), 1 to discover plaintiff’s sexual conduct with third persons. We will leave the trial court’s denial undisturbed after reviewing the several grounds asserted by defendants as justifying such discovery.

On August 5, 1985, Helen Peery (plaintiff) and her husband Claude filed a complaint against Robert Mendez, the County of Merced (County) and Doe defendants. She claimed that in August of 1984…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. MallardTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. John B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Laraway v. SUTRO & CO. INC.California Court of Appeal · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API