Legal Opinion

Adan v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 19, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2024-0591Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEEQA ADAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 24-591 (JDB) ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Secretary of State, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Deeqa Adan and her minor son, A.A.A., bring this action against U.S. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken in his official capacity under the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”),

5 U.S.C. § 551

et seq., to compel certain government officials to schedule an interview for and adjudicate A.A.A.’s visa application. 1 The plaintiffs also urge this Court to set aside…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. Ahmad Nurriddin v. Charles BoldenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API