Legal Opinion

Jeffrey Plotnick v. Computer Sciences Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 8, 2017No. 16-1606PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Duncan wrote the opinion, in which Judges Motz and Wynn joined.

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs-Appellants Jeffrey Plotnick and James Kennedy, former executives of Computer Sciences Corporation (“CSC”), brought claims under § 1132(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et. seq., as amended, alleging denial of benefits under their deferred executive compensation plan after a plan amendment changed the applicable crediting rate. Plotnick and Kennedy sought class certification on be7 half of all retired plan…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Helton v. AT & T Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. Salomaa v. Honda Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Williams v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  5. Gideon Goldstein v. Johnson Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoak v. Plan Adm'r of the Plans of NCR Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
  2. Benzing v. USAA Officer Severance PlanDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
  3. Carmen Gardner v. Geico General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
  4. Colburn v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020
  5. Deborah Bradley, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. DentalPlans.com et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API