Legal Opinion

Hardie v. Bateson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1916No. Appeal, No. 196PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 196, Oct. T., 1915, by Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, a Massachusetts corporation, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1914, No. 1475, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Edward Hardie v. William Bateson and Thomas F. Manning, partners trading as Keystone Construction Company, and Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation. Assumpsit on a contractor’s bond.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 196, Oct. T., 1915, by Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, a Massachusetts corporation, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1914, No. 1475, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Edward Hardie v. William Bateson and Thomas F. Manning, partners trading as Keystone Construction Company, and Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation. Assumpsit on a contractor’s bond. Before Davis, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $3,180.21 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

The bond on which this suit was brought is dated 15th May, 1913. It recites that William Bateson and Thomas F. Manning, trading and doing business as the Keystone Company of Pittsburgh, as principal, and the Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, as surety, are bound unto Edward Hardie in the sum of $8,450.0(1 conditioned that if the principal — The Keystone Construction Company — shall indemnify the obligee against any loss or damage directly arising by reason of the failure of the principals to faithfully perform its engagements arising under a certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Githers v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Heidbrink v. SchaffnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Dingman v. AmsinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Lehigh National Bank v. SeyfriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API