Legal Opinion

State v. Mabe

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1987No. 8621SC978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss on the ground that the State’s evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to permit a finding that the offense occurred upon a “public vehicular area” as defined in G.S. 20-4.01(32). We disagree.

A “public vehicular area” is defined in G.S. 20-4.01(32) (Supp. 1985) as “[a]ny area within the State of North Carolina that is generally open to and used by the public for vehicular traffic, including by way of illustration and not limitation any drive, driveway, road, roadway, street, alley, or parking lot…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Schooldev EastCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. Schooldev EastCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. HoqueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. HoqueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API