Campbell v. Brandenburger
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
By finding a verdict for the plaintiff the jury necessarily found that the defendant was negligent and that the plaintiff’s injuries and other damages were caused thereby; and the evidence clearly justifies that conclusion. The jury was also clearly instructed as to the measure of damages in case their verdict should be for the plaintiff.
At common law, differing from cases where the verdict was excessive, it seems that the Court would seldom, if ever, set aside a Verdict where the damages awarded were too small, if such damages were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Doody v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Fulmele v. ForrestSuperior Court of Delaware · 1913
- Quigley v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Elmer v. FessendenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Yarrington v. ThornburgSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Chrysler Corp. v. QuimbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- Rudnick v. JacobsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Debernard v. ReedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Prettyman v. TopkisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.