Legal Opinion

Executors of Hodge v. Amerman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing on bill and answer and proofs taken before a master.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

The decision of this case turns on a question of notice. On the 21st day of March, 1871, Daniel Polhemus conveyed fourteen and fifty-five hundredths acres of meadow land, lying near Raritan river, between Bound Brook and Somerville, to James Hodge. The purchase-money, $2,182.50, was paid, and the-deed delivered near the date of the deed. Mr. Hodge took possession at once. At the date of the conveyance the land was-enclosed by a post-and-rail fence, and by a hedge, and has been kept so enclosed ever since. The chief value of the land consisted in the hay and pasture it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wickes v. LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Lessee of Billington v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1812

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rutherford Nat. Bank v. H.R. Bogle Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Majewski v. GreenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Michalski v. United StatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Englese v. HydeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API