Golding v. City of New York
City of New York Municipal Court
Action by Thomas W. Golding against the City of New York. Judgment for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegelberg, J.
The plaintiff was employed in the department of bridges, as draftsman, from April 14, 1905, to May 14, 1907, and during such employment received salary at the rate of $1,500 a year. Claiming that he should have received compensation at the rate of $1,950, he brings this action for so much of the difference as is not barred by the statute of limitations. Some of the phases of the controversy involved 'in this action were discussed by the writer in an opinion handed down on April 15, 1912, in the case of Gill v. City of New York.
*1021[1] The plaintiff maintains that he should have been paid at the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tompkins v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Satterlee v. . Board of PoliceNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- People ex rel. Stokes v. TullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Moore v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taylor v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Orthwein v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Carman v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1912