Legal Opinion

Viraj Forgings, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 9, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-158; Court 01-00889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACH, Judge.

I

Introduction

This matter comes before the court following the court’s remand of September 3, 2003, to the United States Department of Commerce (“the Department” or “Com merce”). In Viraj Forgings, Ltd. v. United States, 283 F.Supp.2d 1335 (CIT 2003) (“Viraj I”), the court remanded Commerce’s findings in Certain Stainless Steel Flanges from India; Final Results of An-tidumping Duty Administrative Review, 66 Fed.Reg. 48,244 (Sept. 19, 2001) (“Final Results”). 1 On December 19, 2003, Commerce filed its Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand Certain Forged…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Husteel Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  2. Corus Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API