Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gilbert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1987No. 02177, 02178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

The Commonwealth has undertaken these appeals from an order which suppressed the inculpatory statements of appellees John Gilbert and Vincent Gilbert. We have consolidated these appeals for consideration of the sole issue presented by both appeals, namely, whether the preliminary arraignment of the brothers was held within six hours after their arrest, pursuant to the rule established by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Davenport, 471 Pa. 278, 370 A.2d 301 (1977). We conclude that the order of suppression must be reversed.

*356Our first task is, of course, to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. DuncanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. MonarchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. GilbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API