Legal Opinion

In Re Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 5, 2011No. M 07-1827 SI. MDL. 1827PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT DISPOSITIVE MOTION REGARDING INDIRECT PURCHASER CLAIMS BASED ON FOREIGN SALES

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

On July 29, 2011, the Court heard argument on defendants’ joint dispositive motion regarding indirect purchaser claims based on foreign sales. Having considered the moving papers and the arguments of the parties, and for good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES defendants’ motion.

BACKGROUND

This antitrust class action stems from allegations of a global price-fixing conspir acy in the market for thin-film transistor liquid-crystal display (“TFT-LCD”)…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. Lotes Co., Ltd. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API