Legal Opinion

Sandoval Zink Co. v. Hale

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 15, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in ease for personal injuries. Error to the Circuit Court of Marion County; the Hon. Truman E. Ames, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Higbee

Defendant in error, Henry Hale, brought suit against the Sandoval Zink Company, the plaintiff in error, for personal injuries, the damages, which were laid at $10,000, being claimed to have been received by him while at work in the Zink works of the company at Sandoval, Illinois. The summons .which was issued against the company bore the following return of service:

[[Image here]]

“I have duly served the within summons upon the within named Sandoval Zink Company, by reading the same to Charles W. Granberg, superintendent of the said Sandoval Zink Company, and at the same time delivering to him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. SkeltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Chicago Sectional Electric Underground Co. v. Congdon Brake Shoe Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. City of Danville v. MabinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  4. Lossman v. KnightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. TownsendAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  2. Tyndall v. Triangle Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API