Legal Opinion

Falik v. HORNAGE

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 5, 2010No. 60, 90 September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

The two cases in this consolidated appeal arise from unrelated automobile negligence actions presenting a common procedural background birthing significant discovery disputes. In each case, the respective defendants designated, in pre-trial discovery, Dr. Joel Falik, M.D. (“Dr. Falik” or “Appellant”), a neurosurgeon, as a non-treating medical expert witness. The plaintiffs in each case each noted two-fold depositions of Dr. Falik: a “records deposition duces tecum” to be followed at a later date by a testimonial deposition. The notices of records deposition duces tecum requested the physician…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney General v. Anne Arundel County School Bus Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Elkins v. SykenSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Allen & Diggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Kearney v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Adkins v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API