Legal Opinion
The Strathdon
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 22, 1898PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
On the 28th day of June, 1894, William Burrell and others, owners of the steamship Strathdon, petitioned for the limitation of their liability. The only claim filed against them is that of Charles P. Armstrong and others, arising from injury to the cargo from fire and water, in the Suez Canal, on November 1, 1893, at about 2:30 o’clock in the morning. Such owners oppose the limitation of liability, and claim damages classified as follows: (1) Injury to cargo in hold No. 2 directly from the fire, and injury to cargo in holds 1, 2, and 3 from water used to extinguish the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Norwich Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Craig v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- International Mercantile Marine S. S. Co. v. W. & A. Fletcher Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Consumers Import Co. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kabushiki KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Earle & Stoddart, Inc. v. Ellerman's Wilson Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.