International Mercantile Marine S. S. Co. v. W. & A. Fletcher Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). There are two questions at bar; First, were the respondent’s servants so negligent in performance of their work that such negligence caused libelant’s loss; and, second, did respondent do that work under a contract that excused or released it from the consequences of negligent performance ?
We consider both these queries as of fact, but (as usual) the facts fit into and are to some extent interpreted by a context of law.
The contract for reconditioning the St. Louis and other vessels belonging to libelants was one of bailment (Pan American v. Robins [C. C.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mynard v. Syracuse, Binghamton & New York RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- The OceanicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- North American Ry. Const. Co. v. Cincinnati Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
- Pan-American Petroleum Transp. Co. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Cornec v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Hall-Scott Motor Car Co. v. Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Quinn v. Milner ex rel. Hartford Fire Ins.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Robert R. Buntin, Claude Overton, C. P. Long, Jr., and R. W. Thompson, Jr. v. Mike FletchasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.