Slife v. Borough of Dorranceton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 117, Jan. Term, 1917, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1914, No. 552, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Anthony L. Slife v. Borough of Dorranceton. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 117, Jan. Term, 1917, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1914, No. 552, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Anthony L. Slife v. Borough of Dorranceton. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. The facts appear in the following opinion of the court below sur defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v.: The plaintiff while on his way to work, stepped and fell upon certain ice which had accumulated on the sidewalk, and he brought this action against the borough for the resulting damages of personal injury. He asserted as the foundation of municipal…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below refusing defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Weismiller Et Vir. v. FarrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Duvall v. City of New CastleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Lumley v. Grove City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Coyle v. New KensingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.