Legal Opinion

State v. Gums

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1995No. 21152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Ethan J. Gums was found guilty of petit theft following a trial to the district court sitting without a jury. On this appeal from the judgment of conviction Gums challenges the exclusion of certain testimony and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of guilt. We find no error in the district court’s evidentiary ruling, and we conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that Gums committed petit theft. Therefore, we affirm.

Gums was employed at the Target Department Store in Twin Falls, Idaho. On January 1, 1993, Gums was stationed at the cash…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. FilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. WardenIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HoffmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. MitchellIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API