Johnson v. United States

Appellant was convicted of possession of methylphenidate (Ritalin) in violation of the District of Columbia Dangerous Drug Act (DDA), D.C.Code 1973, § 33-701 et seq. He admits possession of the drug but argues that he was convicted under the wrong Act. His argument, as we understand it, is that he should have been charged under the Federal Controlled Substance Act (CSA), 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (1976).

DDA, besides naming certain specific drugs, includes other drugs or compounds found and declared by the District of Columbia Council to have certain specified effects; but the Act provides that…