In re Dybel
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals affirming rejections of claims 1-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and claims 17 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in application serial No. 832,542, filed May 12, 1969, which is a continuation of application serial No. 670,189, filed September 25, 1967, for “Piezoelectric Transducer Sensor.” The controlling issues involve the questions of whether the invention was in public use or on sale within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) more than a year prior to the filing date of the parent application, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Egbert v. LippmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Shatterproof Glass Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Libbey-Owens Ford Company and Leybold-Heraeus Gmbh, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Labounty Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission, Dudley Shearing MacHine Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.