Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. First State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1932No. 28036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frost, District Judge.

In this action Charles T. Haas seeks to collect a draft drawn in his favor upon its Omaha correspondent by the First State Bank of Alliance, Nebraska. It appears from the evidence that Haas represented certain nonresident heirs who were entitled to the sum of $6,994.89 under a decree in partition. There were other heirs whose rights had been established in the same decree to whom the referee had paid their share. The amount due the nonresident heirs apparently was not paid directly to them by the referee because the proper authority did not appear of record authorizing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Sallaske v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. American State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Newman Grove State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API