Legal Opinion
Boling Concrete Construction Co. v. Townsend
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 8, 1985No. 48363PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAERTNER, Judge.
Boling Concrete Construction Company (Boling) brought the instant action against Davis and Laverne Townsend to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The Townsends filed a third party petition against Midtown Medical Center Redevelopment Corp. (Midtown) and the City of St. Louis (City). A consent judgment for $5,800.00 was entered in favor of Boling against the Townsends. From summary judgment in favor of Midtown and the City, the Townsends appeal. We affirm.
*843Midtown is an urban redevelopment corporation organized under Chapter 353, RSMo.1978, to which the City has granted the power of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Martinez v. LanksterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Barr v. Kamo Elec. Corp., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- N. G. Heimos Greenhouse, Inc. v. City of Sunset HillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Muir v. RuderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- St. Louis County v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Sinopole v. MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sperry v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990