Legal Opinion

Preston v. Harlow

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 14, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Cammack

Affirming.

This suit involves the validity of a deed, the provisions of which, aside from the description of the property, are:

“This Deed made and entered into this 30th day of December 1920 by and between Bnrt Harlow and Mayme B. Harlow, his wife, parties of the first part, and Joseph Gardner, unmarried, party of the second part.
“Witnesseth: That in consideration of the re-conveyance by the said second party to the first parties as hereinafter set out the said parties of the -.first part have granted, bargained, and sold and .hereby convey with the covenant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirby v. HuletteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Hinton's Ex'r v. Hinton's CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Damron v. DamronCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Harned v. SmootCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  3. Hays v. Kentucky West Virginia Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. White v. HoggeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  5. Young v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API