Legal Opinion · Dissent

William Allen Spencer v. Bumyong Lee, M.D., and St. Elizabeth Hospital

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 3, 1989No. 87-1203Published

1DissentCummings, Circuit Judge

Disagreeing with the majority’s conclusion that the actions of the defendants in committing Spencer to St. Elizabeth Hospital necessarily cannot constitute state action, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding. In order to determine whether the defendants’ roles in the involuntary commitment of the plaintiff qualify as state action such that the defendants may be subject to liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, it is necessary to elaborate on the majority’s discussion of the statutory authority for defendants’ conduct.

Involuntary commitment to a mental health institution may be…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API