Legal Opinion

Tate v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 4, 1997No. 1951906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate") sued for a declaratory judgment, requesting that the Baldwin County Circuit Court determine the amount of insurance coverage available to Enoch Tate on a loss-of-consortium claim. The claim arose out of a motor vehicle accident involving a vehicle driven by Enoch Tate's wife, Angela Tate, and a vehicle driven by Allstate's insured, Myrtis Franklin. The trial court entered a judgment declaring that Enoch Tate's loss-of-consortium claim arose out of Angela Tate's bodily injuries and thus was not a separate claim. This holding meant that Allstate's policy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Upton v. Mississippi Valley Title Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. St. Paul Mercury Ins. v. Chilton-ShelbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. WESTERN WORLD INS. v. City of TuscumbiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Valliere v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Allstate Insurance v. HandegardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. TWIN CITY FIRE INS. COMPANY v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Hargett v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of AlabamaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Allstate Property and Casualty Company v. WilksDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API