Legal Opinion

Beaubien v. Hindman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for Rehearing. The facts of this case are stated in Beaubien v. Hindman, 37 Kas. 227, and in the opinion herein, filed at the session of the court in February, 1888.

1Per curiam

Upon the motion for a rehearing in this case, we are called upon again to examine the testimony whether Mrs. Beaubien was a purchaser of the land in controversy, *472for value, without actual or constructive notice. It appears that Mrs. Beaubien received her deed on April 2,1883; John Campbell died September 18, 1882, at his farm in Mission Creek township; the title of the premises in controversy at the time of his death was in Campbell; in November, after his death, Mrs. Hindman moved- back to the Mill creek farm ; remained there about two weeks, and then went to Topeka and boarded; on the 20th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. School District No. 82 v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stalcup v. StalcupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API