Legal Opinion

Marullo v. Rooney

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1971No. 4241PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REDMANN, Judge.

Defendants, the driver and the insurer of one automobile which struck another’s rear, appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the other car’s driver and passenger, for damages resulting from the collision.

We annul as to defendant driver, who was neither cited nor waived citation, C. C.P. art. 1201. We affirm as to the defendant insurer.

The purpose of defendant insurer’s appeal is to obtain a reduction in the $900 pain and suffering award to each plaintiff on the ground that plaintiffs would not submit to a physical examination by defendant’s orthopedist prior to their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. FisherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Kennedy v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Purnell v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Brister v. MartinezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API