Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Bartow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 8, 2005Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Smith J. and Adams, J.P. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I agree with the majority that the recent decisions in

People v Hafeez (100 NY2d 253 [2003]) and People v Payne (3 NY3d 266 [2004]) require that we reverse the defendant’s conviction for depraved indifference murder. The evidence established that defendant either hired or dared a person to kill his wife and then allowed the person to enter the apartment which defendant and his wife shared, whereupon the person shot the defendant’s wife in the head from a distance of approximately one inch. This evidence established that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. KibbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API