Legal Opinion
McAlester v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 19, 1935No. 26489PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OSBORN, Y. C. J.
This action was instituted in this court by J. B. McAlester as petitioner, against the Oklahoma Tax Commission, Hubert L. Bolen, State Treasurer, and C. C. Childers, State Auditor, hereinafter referred to as respondents, wherein it is sought to compel respondents to comply with the provisions of House Bill No. 29 (Session Laws 1935, chapter 60, article 11, p. 327) in the distribution and expenditure of funds collected as excise taxes on gasoline. Respondent Oklahoma Tax Commission admits its refusal to comply with the provisions of said act, and as ground therefor contends…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Pocket Veto CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Regents of the State University v. Trapp, AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Carter v. RathburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Fischer v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Erskine v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by14 opinions
- Redmond v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Davis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- In Re Request of JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re State Funding Bonds of 1935, Series ASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Cope v. Childers, State AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.