Legal Opinion
Kohler v. First National Bank of Tonasket
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1930No. 21898. En BancPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
The Epso Products Company, a corporation, was engaged generally in the canning business, operating in the vicinity of Tonasket, Washington. Prior to October 8, 1925, the company, through its proper officers, made arrangements to purchase from the appellant a certain piece of machinery known as a filter. This was to be what is generally known to the trade as a cash transaction, and on October 8, 1925, the Epso Products Company purchased and caused to be sent to G-. M. Kohler a draft on the Dex ter Horton National Bank of Seattle, in words and figures as follows:
“The First National Bank of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Fillebrown v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Liberty Trust Co. v. TiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Bank of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Polotsky v. Artisans Savings BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Crunk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Allison v. First National Bank in AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Western Surety Co. v. FriederichsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.