Legal Opinion

Cenance v. Bohn Ford, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided April 14, 1977No. Civ. A. 76-2878PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, District Judge:

The plaintiff seeks damages for a claimed violation of the Truth in Lending Act as a result of failure properly to itemize the charges made and properly to identify the true lender on the required disclosure form. Although the amount of the charge that was not properly itemized is small, the statutory violation is evident. The true lender was not identified in a way that would be clear to the borrower. Hence, judgment is rendered for the plaintiff.

I

On 26 April 1976, plaintiff entered into a contract with Bohn Ford (“Bohn”) to purchase a used 1974 Ford…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Cheryl A. Meyers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Clearview Dodge Sales, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Edwin Grant and Lauretta Grant Johnson v. Imperial Motors, Nathaniel Johnson v. Imperial Motors, Johnnie Mae Gordon v. Backus Cadillac-Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. James W. Price v. Franklin Investment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. Milhollin v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Jennings v. EdwardsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1978
  4. Sharp v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1978
  5. Childs v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API