Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barnhart v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1915No. Docket No. 151Published

Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Case by Sherman T. Barnhart against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company and Michigan Central Railroad Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1ConcurrenceKuhn, J.

Act No. 104, § 2, Pub. Acts 1909, provides as follows:

“In all actions hereafter brought against any such common carrier railroad company under or by virtue of any of the provisions of this act to recover damages for personal injury to an employee, or where such injuries have resulted in his death, the fact that the employee may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery: Provided, that the negligence of such employee was of a lesser degree than the negligence of such company, its officers, agents or employees.”

*542As Mr. Justice Bird says in his opinion, the question to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amanta v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Haines v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Becker v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WilkieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Welch v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API