Legal Opinion

Fassitt v. Forth Tioga Building & Loan Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1938No. Appeal, 77PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

The plaintiff held a first mortgage on premises No. 3237 North 17th Street, Philadelphia. The defendant held a second mortgage on the same premises. The defendant mortgagee, because of condition broken, entered into possession of the mortgaged premises and collected the rents from January 31, 1932 to February 18, 1936, when the plaintiff, as first mortgagee, entered into possession and thereafter himself collected the rents until the property was sold at sheriff’s sale on his first mortgage, and purchased by him. Having subsequently paid the taxes for 1935 and 1936,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. BergsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Provident Trust Co. v. Judicial B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Integrity Trust Co. v. St. Rita B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Integrity Trust Co. v. St. Rita's Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Myers-Macomber Engineers v. M. L. W. Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. David Oil Co. v. FogleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. McNicholas' AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API