Herndon v. Sentry Insurance

CARVER, Justice.

Patrick L. Herndon appeals from a take-nothing judgment in his suit for the loss of two rings through theft. Sentry Insurance Co. now concedes error as to one ring of the value of $300 insured as “scheduled personal property” under their policy; thus, our dispute is limited to whether the second ring of a value (in 1977) of $895 is covered under Sentry’s policy. Because of Sentry’s concession of error, we reverse and render judgment for Herndon for $300 for the first ring, but we affirm the trial court’s denial of any relief to Herndon on the second ring because the Sentry…