Folkman v. Myers
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, who filed the following' opinion: “1. I think it clear that the deed of conveyance of August 1st, 1877, from the Camden and Atlantic Land Company to Jacob H. Leedom, and the subsequent deed of conveyance of April 1st, 1890, from Jacob II.
Read the full summary
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, who filed the following' opinion: “1. I think it clear that the deed of conveyance of August 1st, 1877, from the Camden and Atlantic Land Company to Jacob H. Leedom, and the subsequent deed of conveyance of April 1st, 1890, from Jacob II. Leedom to Charles R. Myers, for a part of the land embraced in the prior conveyance vested in Myers the fee of a tract of land fronting fifty feet in width on the ocean with its westerly boundary line fifty feet easterly from and parallel to the easterly line of Missouri…
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenoiiard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, -Black, Katzenbaci-i, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk— 13. For reversal — None.-
2Cited by4 opinions
- Predham v. HolfesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Redmond v. New Jersey Historical SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Mannillo v. GorskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Lint, Butscher, C., Co. v. Brinkerhoff EstateNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933