Legal Opinion

Oaklawn Bank v. Alford

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 20, 1993No. CA 92-729PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Judge.

This appeal follows the successful assertion of the statute of limitations by appellee, Spencer Alford, in an action brought against him by appellant, Oaklawn Bank, for a deficiency judgment following the repossession and sale of collateral securing a promissory note.

On July 1, 1985, appellee signed a note in the amount of $11,655.36 to Oaklawn Bank in order to finance the purchase of a 1985 Jeep. The note provided that appellee would make forty-eight monthly payments of $242.82 beginning August 16, 1985, and that appellee would be in default if he failed to make a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Dupree v. Twin City BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Corning Bank v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Rice v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Eckels v. Arkansas Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. EisenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  2. First Hawaiian Bank v. PowersHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Helms v. University of MissouriCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Ultracuts Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Joseph v. Security Bank of HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API