Legal Opinion · Dissent

Foley Bros. v. County of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1924No. 23,714Published

1DissentWilson, C. J.

(dissenting.)

I do not agree to or with the conclusion of Mr. Justice Holt and of Mr. Justice Dibell in the foregoing opinion which in effect affirms the lower court by a divided vote of this court. This situation, the large amount involved, and the public interest in the controversy, in my judgment, justifies me in stating my reasons for dissenting to the views of my associates and I consider it the imperative duty of both sides of this controversy to disclose, under the unusual circumstances confronting us, such reasons as they may have to sustain their conclusion.

A piece of the material in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. . City of PoughkeepsieNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Cargill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Camp v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  4. Bell Lumber Co. v. SeamanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Lawton v. JoestingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API