Arnold Cornman v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Before COWEN, Chief Judge, REED, Justice (Ret.), LARAMORE, DURFEE, DAVIS, COLLINS and SKELTON, Judges. REED, Justice
(Ret.), sitting by designation.
The sole issue in this case concerns the meaning of the words “in any case” as they refer to a limitation on the amount of compensation payable to informers under the Tariff Act of 1930 (46 Stat. 758, as amended, 49 Stat. 527). The specific informers’ compensation section involved here, 19 U.S.C. § 1619, provides “a compensation of 25 per centum of the net amount recovered, but…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McLaren v. FleischerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
3Cited by12 opinions
- John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Selman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Robert A. Muldonian v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- White & Case LLP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Weir v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.