Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Novak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1949No. Appeal, 18PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

Defendant, Leonard Novak, has appealed from judgment and sentence following his conviction on an indictment charging armed robbery. Novak was jointly indicted and tried with Joseph Boyle and Joseph Rogers, who were his alleged accomplices in holding up Sam Maruzzi at his grocery store at 643 Moosic Street, Scranton, Pennsylvania, at or about ten o’clock p. m. on De cember 11, 1947. They were convicted. The three defendants moved for new trials. Boyle and Rogers withdrew their motions and were sentenced. Novak’s motion for new trial was refused, and he has appealed.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. MulroySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. MezickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Commonwealth v. SydloskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Commonwealth v. QuinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. RoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. COHENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. VentoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. GibbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API