Legal Opinion

Value Vinyls, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 30, 2007No. Court 01-00896Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AQUILINO, Senior Judge:

Courts are to interpret the language of statutes so as to give effect to the intent of Congress. E.g., Minor v. Mechanics Bank of Alexandria, 26 U.S. 46, 64 (1828); United States v. American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc., 310 U.S. 534, 542 (1940). Sometimes they yield to the legislative intent even when “it appears that a literal interpretation of the statute involved would produce a result contrary to the apparent legislative intent”. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. v. United States, 19 CCPA 415, 419, T.D. 45578 (1932).. . . All rules of construction must yield if the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API