Legal Opinion

In re January 27, 2017 Order Releasing Grand Jury Materials

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2018No. 27435PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals from the trial court's order of January 27, 2017, granting in part the petition of Defendant-appellee, C.P., for the release of certain grand jury testimony and associated exhibits. The State argues that the trial court erred because C.P. may not use the materials for the purpose indicated in his petition; because C.P. failed to demonstrate a particularized need for the testimony; and because the court did not *1172 inspect the materials in camera before releasing them. For the following reasons, we find that the court should have denied C.P.'s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rehberg v. PaulkSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. Susan King v. Todd HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. State v. ColeyOhio Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Desmond v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. GillispieOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API