Legal Opinion

Peralta v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2017No. 92675-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

/F·I~I:E" " IN CLERICS OFFICE ' IUPfteME COURT, STATE Of Wr~ I..-... DATE FEB 1 lOll ~---taAJ\ ~v\.<l1dS.4- ) t..C'J CHifiF JUaTICE l StiSACCARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEBORAH PERALTA, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 92675-1 ) v. ) En Bane ) STATE OF WASHINGTON and ) WASHINGTON STATE PATROL, ) Filed FEB t 6 2017 ) Respondents. ) ) WIGGINS, J.-We are asked to review the trial court's ruling that plaintiff Deborah Peralta's admission during pretrial discovery should be given conclusive effect. Peralta admitted without qualification to being "under the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. CastellanosWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. CastellanosWashington Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API