Legal Opinion

Musgrove v. Hamilton County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. —T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

The various complainants in this case are justices of the peace, constables, and deputy sheriffs of Hamilton county. They sue the county of Hamilton to recover from it certain fees and costs which they claim to have earned in the discharge of their official duties, and which they allege have been paid into the county treasury of Hamilton county, either in money, or in work and labor done for the county, in accordance with the statutes of the State.

*4There was a demurrer to the bill, which was overruled, and the county has appealed.

The allegations of the bill are, in detail: That up to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WilburTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KerbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State Ex Rel. Chanaberry v. StooksburyTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Reagan v. Fentress CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Hurst v. Sullivan CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. William Cox v. A.C. GillessCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API